Citation

De Leon, Pristine, and Corrie Tan. “Eye to the Undercurrent: Criticism in Response to a Milieu.” Art Criticism Writing Workshop 2026, Online.

Quotes

  • species:
  • themes:

Collations

Literature notes

Eye to the Undercurrent: Criticism in Response to a Milieu

shifting from coverage to commentary, reportage to criticism

what to write
where to find what to write
how to write

Would you write about a work that you deeply dislike?

  • questionable ethics, politically ideology, commercial success than engagement
  • she doesn’t write about it
  • market transactions rather than critical provocations
  • don’t waste 900-1,000 words to write about it
  • avoid negative reviews: (1) the artwork is bad and (2) the critic is right
  • personal position: her negativity could lead to bad prose

If we don

exhibition review to the thinkpiece and cultural journalism

exhibition review

  • describe, contextualize, interpret, evaluate
  • usually attirbutes

there are concerns not covered by exhibtion review

think piece

  • verdict is rechanneled into curiosity, inquiry
  • talk about the times
  • treats work as symptom of a broader tendency, issue, or sensibility

The Critic: Villain or vital cog?

Undercurrents

  • What is underneath contemporary art?
  • trends, tendencies, sensibilities
  • infrastructure, issues

“If there is no conflict, there is no community.” — Pristine de Leon

How does our milieu differ from theirs?

She finds it difficult to differentiate what is coverage from commentary.

Reportage is primarily representation.
Thinkpiece has argument or a sharp question.

Boundaries are fluid.

Thinkpiece related to op-ed.

Thinkpiece is closely related to digital writing (e.g., FB posts that go viral).

Conservatives vs modernists

Victorio Edades vs. Guillermo Tolentino

Edades critiquing tradition and trends

  • distortion and contrast

against

  • academism
  • academic art is Amorsolo school
  • classical values
  • representational
  • perspective
  • art as imitation of nature

1st half of the 20th century

academic = conventional but not original

critic as provocatuer, as disruptive force

artist manifesto

  • brings theory into the streets
  • similar to the newspaper essay, not as thorough as an essay in a literary journal

Edades’ writing served a pedagogic purpose

Q: Is there a dominant aesthetic shaping the visual arts today?

  • art is more plural now
  • no single dominant style but tendencies
  • where do we find these tendencies?

School, training, group, collective
Market
Awards, competitions
Year

What makes a good critic?
Cesare A. X. Syjuco

  • first recipient of the KLFI award

newspaper critic is gut feel and intuition not scholarly

He comments on institutional support.

The market is not an abstraction.

Mabini Art

  • arose from
  • Mabini St. line of galleries that cater to tourists

Honest

  • candor
  • tone of the work

Adversarial voice, candor
Sound of his writing

sweeping statements

What does this tone do?

  • this tone is not a requirement

the tone is performance, signals distance from a work

the tone is what separates the thinkpiece from the academic essay

  • it’s not as thorough
  • focused on articulation, how it addresses affect
  • in affect, we feel the community

Alice Guillermo

style is just one moment

a critic can be doubtful and skeptical

contemporary: our points of reference are plural

simultaneity rather than linearity

contemporary: about history

the modern, indigneous, and future share a discursive space

Contemporary is messy

How to write the contemporary? BEGIN WITH TENDENCIES.

Participatory work.

Emerging Islands residencies.

Communities are often outsiders to the art community.

  • immediately regard participatory as ethical and ethical as good.

Claire Bishop

  • critic of participatory practice

little info on how the engagement transpired
the site of engagement is itself the point of contention, that can be the object of critic


Relational Criticism

Navigating relations

Criticism is a relational act.

Essay as journey exploration of artist, critic, and reader.

Archipelagic approach to writing.

Critic = povoking companion (pengganggu pendamping)

  • we’re here to journey alongside you

Critic as kapwa

  • instead of parasite deriving nutrients
  • how can be a critic who is symbiotic?
  • the organism is unharmed by your existence
  • these are multiple ways of relating to each other

Criticism as care work.

How am caring of this place?

Criticism as a durational project.

Critiquiness separates the critic from the ecology.

Slow journalism

  • rebuke the new media landscape

Who do you write for?

  • the artist
  • The informed reader

How might we write for them?

  • context
  • corporeality
  • connctedness

She keeps relationship warm with a writer.

sustained metaphor

How might the critic be kapwa?

Critic as not excluded but part of an ecology.


Synthesis

The opposite of clickbait is literary.

Instead of gatekeeping, we want porosity.

Smuggling literary pleasures into theory

When does being an insider become a burden or tricky?

  • Theory is tactile. We feel it in our bodies.
  • insider-outsider
  • you can’t be super close to someone
  • you can’t have just one vantage point
  • practice: what is this constant practice of proximity? how far and how close am I?
  • we can also realize, it is not our role to be a critic. If we are older and we know too much of the politics, we can’t write about it.
  • part of relation is dealing with conflict
  • she values her mobility
  • critic as intermediary
  • you don’t identify with a certain group, distance is more possible, critical distance

Do you still find yourself taking an adversarial stance?

  • assert an interrogative stance
  • nuance must be exercised by a critic
  • it must play out in the level of the paragraph or sentence

How does the reader respond to you? How different from newspaper readership.

50 percent of online interactions are unrepaired

Critics don’t monopolize criticality.
Curators can also be critical.

Questioning art and questioning ourselves questioning art

https://www.jom.media/in-solidarity-with-our-activists/

https://www.centre42.sg/residencies/co-lab-residency/9357/critical-ecologies-critical-anomalies/

https://www.centre42.sg/editorials/9438/critical-ecologies-an-introduction-to-a-collective-of-critics/ 

^about our critical project


Questions

Can art criticism contend with its own undercurrents? Has this been done before?

Prompts